Table 2 Descriptive statistics LFS 1992–2012 estimation sample
From: The impact of parental income and education on the schooling of their children
Paternal log earnings | Paternal school leaving age | Maternal school leaving age | Paternal age | Maternal age | Father affected by RoSLA | Mother affected by RoSLA | Father born Sept – Dec. | Mother born Sept – Dec. | Paternal union membership | Age of respondent | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sons: N = 8661 | |||||||||||
Did not stay in FT education (26%) | 5.91 | 15.83 | 15.86 | 45.39 | 43.20 | 0.43 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.42 | 17.13 |
(0.49) | 1.09) | (0.98) | (5.80) | (4.92) | (0.49) | (0.47) | (0.46) | (0.47) | (0.49) | (0.76) | |
Did stay in FT education (74%) | 6.18 | 16.72 | 16.79 | 47.21 | 45.09 | 0.41 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.41 | 17.12 |
(0.61) | (1.49) | (1.42) | (5.35) | (4.72) | (0.49) | (0.46) | (0.46) | (0.47) | (0.49) | (0.76) | |
*** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |||||
Daughters: N = 8137 | |||||||||||
Did not stay in FT education (17%) | 5.91 | 15.85 | 15.94 | 45.27 | 43.12 | 0.46 | 0.33 | 0.31 | 0.33 | 0.41 | 17.14 |
(0.53) | (1.06) | (1.01) | (5.48) | (4.70) | (0.50) | (0.47) | (0.46) | (0.47) | (0.49) | (0.75) | |
Did stay in FT education (83%) | 6.20 | 16.85 | 16.87 | 47.18 | 45.11 | 0.40 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.42 | 17.11 |
(0.61) | (1.54) | (1.43) | (5.28) | (4.67) | (0.49) | (0.45) | (0.46) | (0.47) | (0.49) | (0.77) | |
*** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | * |